More on Marsh Lane School; News from the Airport; St Catherine's Hill Management

August 2015

Proposed School at Marsh Lane

This contentious project continues to dominate local issues. The main development since the July Newsletter has been the receipt on 7th August of a reply from Councillor Robert Gould, Leader of Dorset County Council to our letter to him of 9th July 2015.

As this affects directly or indirectly virtually our whole membership we’re going to reproduce the answer in full here plus comment so you don’t need to have read our letter to understand his reply. However, particularly if you’re a new reader, on our website you’ll find not just our letter but also a wealth of other related material plus all the old newsletters.

Councillor Robert Gould writes:

Thank you for your e-mailed letter of 9 July and I am sorry for the delay in responding.  As you indicated I did need to talk to various officers involved in the project before being able to give you a full response and some of them have been away from the office recently.  However, they are now back and I have been able to catch up with them.


Funding for any project is always critical, particularly in the current financial climate and officers working on projects are always expected to deliver the outcome of the projects as cost effectively as they can. 

In the case of the new school in West Christchurch this is intended to follow the County Council’s baseline approach to school projects.  This is looking to standardise design and construction of buildings as far as we can to ensure the limited funding we have is used as wisely as possible, to deliver as much as we can in terms of meeting our ‘Basic need’ requirements across the County.  Having said that, the current estimate for the (cost of the) new school is still in excess of £6 million.

(WCRA Comment: this must be read against a background of DCC struggling to balance its books and to pay out less than it takes in – projected deficit for this financial year is £15 million. For details see previous newsletters and notes of ACRA meetings with Councillor Robert Gould)

Basic Need for the School 

As you have indicated, numbers (of infants) in the area are continuing to rise and for this September demand for places at Christchurch Infant School was in excess of the places available, and the majority of those children who couldn’t get in to their local catchment school are now in the ‘school within a school’ (portakabins), which is hoped will become the new primary school in due course.  We are predicting that this demand for places over and above the current capacity at both Christchurch Infant and Junior School will continue into the future.

 (WCRA Comment: we are not now aware of any serious disagreement as to the basic need for the school)

Alternative Sites – Bailey Bridge

I fully understand the views and concerns of the residents of Marsh Lane about the choice of the site for the new school, and that they feel that there could be more appropriate alternatives.  However, you will know from the details officers have already given you, and which have been published on your web site, that there really is no other suitable site in the right location and of the correct size which would meet the needs of this school.

I understand that at the time that information was issued the site you have referred to as Bailey Bridge was not on the market, and so cost was not a factor in the comments made about the unsuitability of that site for the new school.  The decision to reject that site at the time was based on: (a) its location to serve the community of West Christchurch; (b) its proximity to the existing school (concentrating all the provision at the southern end of the catchment area); and (c) the size of the site. 

Looking at its location, at the rear of the retail park and bordered by the river and railway line, and its previous uses and levels, it would have been expensive to develop as a school either as the new primary school, or indeed along the lines you have suggested in terms of re-location of the existing Junior School.

I believe that the site has since come back on to the market for a short period of time and the closing date for best bids for the purchase closed earlier in the month.  Initial indications we have been able to ascertain from the selling agents are that the expected price for the site is far in excess of what the County would be able to pay for a site, so whilst this was not a contributing factor in the initial decision, it would be a major one now. 

It should also be noted that this site is located in ‘flood zone 3’, so whilst it may not have shown any signs of flooding in the recent past there would be no guarantee that permission for the development of a school in an area of such designation would be permitted.

Alternative Sites – Parkfield School 

The issue of Parkfield School in this process is a difficult one.  There is the question of whether parents would choose to send their child there over a ‘non’ free school, however, you are right there is a question of whether that school would have the capacity to take the additional children predicted in the area, as well as those they are already catering for. 

As it is, their re-location to the site at the Airport has now been delayed for a further year. 

Parkfield are currently advertising a capacity in their reception year group for 2016/17 to 2018/19 of 56 pupils.  Even with this provision in the local area, taking into account those parents who the school is already catering for, and who may already wish their child to attend the school through choice or sibling link, it is unlikely that this provision will be able to also accommodate those children within the catchment of Christchurch Infant School who would thus be unsuccessful in securing a place there if the new primary school were not provided.

(WCRA comment: we now have in writing evidence provided by the most senior member of DCC that their officers have investigated all other reasonable sites. We have from outset believed that we owed it to our members who live in and around Marsh Lane to ensure that was done. The website now contains Google pictures of the main sites that have been investigated thanks to work done by a resident.

We will continue to endeavour to ensure that the impact of the school upon those residents is mitigated as far as is possible but we do think the time has come to accept that the Marsh Lane site is the best of what is available and affordable)

Access to the Marsh Lane Site 

All the concerns which have been raised with officers regarding traffic problems in the area have been considered by the relevant Highway officers.  This is what led to the traffic proposals which formed part of the public information event. 

However, from the event those plans are likely to develop further to look to address the continuing concerns which are being raised, although it should be noted that this scheme will not solve the existing traffic congestion in the area, but hopefully will not make it any worse. 
The plans which were shown at the public event were initial plans based on the experience of the Highway Engineers in such matters (and were presented) for comment. 

They were not cost driven in what was presented, and indeed, if it is felt they need to be enhanced further following the reactions received to ensure safety and to ensure an appropriate access to the proposed school site, then they will be.

(WCRA Comment: this is very good news. We felt that the proposals presented at the public event were minimal and largely failed to address the concerns we had previously submitted to officers – they’re on the website if you want to read them. We now have a degree of confidence that further measures will be incorporated into the scheme – and they need to be.

On a daily basis local residents see speeding cars, vans and motorbikes around Bronte, Marsh and Suffolk. The sharp bends and narrowness made worse by parked vehicles are a constant source of concern. DCC needs to get a grip on this issue. Local residents raised a traffic calming petition in 2012 that has been ignored up to now. DCC needs to tie this up with the provision of the new school as none of us want to see children maimed or killed.
As to traffic on the B3073, the planned lorry movements transporting gravel from sites like Roeshot Hill, plus the planned housing increases at Parley and Roeshot are all going to make matters worse. The new school will just form part of that overall pattern – a problem to which DCC admit they have no solution)

Validity of the Traffic Volume Measurement

I have queried the traffic survey details with the relevant engineers, taking on board your comments about when they were undertaken.  I have been advised that the counts were taken from the 5th to the 19th May 2015, with the one in Suffolk Avenue commencing on the 8th May 2015.  The flows for the Election Day (7th May 2015) were removed from the flow profiles for the purposes of the public event and I am advised that this resulted in a negligible difference overall in the average traffic flows for the period the counts were undertaken.  It should also be noted that the count stopped on the 19th May 2015, and the half term holiday did not commence until the week commencing the 25th May 2015, so this would have had no impact on the count details.

Problems with the site

Officers are aware of the issue of midges in the area, and this was reiterated to them at the event.  The County‘s Senior Ecologist, who was present at the event, has been engaged to advise on this issue as well as many other ecological matters associated with this site.  This will be followed up further as the scheme develops, and where possible, mitigation measures will be put in place as part of the scheme.

Future Demand for school places

I can assure you that officers are planning ahead to ensure sufficient primary and secondary places are available in both West and East Christchurch.  Works are already in hand at a number of primary schools in the area to increase capacity further and as you will be aware from previous correspondence with (Councillor) Margaret Phipps, Dorset County Council has identified the need for at least 3 additional forms of entry in the secondary sector in the Christchurch area moving forward, although at this stage it has not committed as to where these places will be provided. 

The issues around the provision of this proposed new primary school are not easy to resolve and both I and the officers involved are fully aware of the sense of feeling the proposal has created, both for and against the development.  There is demonstrably a need for additional primary school places in the area and that is what officers are endeavouring to do as quickly as they can, and in what is considered the most suitable and appropriate site.

We asked local ward Councillor Fred Neale to comment:

It must be difficult either way you look at it, but we are all aware of the needs.
Since I became Ward Councillor in 2007, I can tell you that here, we have seen drastic increases in numbers of residents. Many are of younger working age and many have families, so I can only see the issue getting worse for places the longer it goes on. 
These increases happened over a period of relatively short time, after the removal of the Jumpers Infill Policy, now a long time gone! But we have seen over the years, constant infills, (mainly flats), home extensions, loft conversion, bungalows turned into houses, permitted developments and every bit of space developed into within its maximums. Worse still, no addition to any roads network, schools, doctors, only the removal of our hospital, so it is obvious, we should be considered to be full, but do the developers know this? I guess not. 
My own feelings are that this proposal is inevitable. We can only try and make it as easy as possible, to be accepted, particularly for all those who are more affected by the proposals than others, it will mean compromises, not a word that comes to the front when dealing with such proposals. Anything that can be done, does look like County are listening to residents and they are trying to answer the issues. We should not roll over, but try and get as much as we can to alleviate all the issues that have been raised. Some additional on-site parking/drop off area may just help here.
Whatever my residents want me to follow up, or how they feel I should vote, I am happy to listen to them, but from all sides, not just a few that are most vocal, without any justification from outside the area. 
If we all agree I do feel we should progress as soon as possible, unless I can be convinced otherwise, so as to save more expenses accruing, that way we should be able to get far more from this for the residents.
Last month our letter to Councillor Robert Gould provoked a large response from you. A small number of people who are against the Marsh Lane site accused us of being biased in favour of Marsh Lane. A small number of people in favour of Marsh Lane accused us of being biased against the Marsh Lane site. The large majority thanked us for taking a reasoned approach.
Please feel free to comment upon Councillor Robert Gould’s letter, Councillor Fred Neale’s views and indeed our own comments. I personally have just one request – can we keep things civilised please. In reply to three specific  comments that were aimed at me personally (a) yes, I did know my father (b) nobody pays me a penny to do this and (c) what you suggest is physically impossible for somebody of my age – or indeed any age I suspect
Bournemouth Airport
Airport management report a good start to the year, with passenger numbers at 216,000 (2.8% better than budget), revenue 2.3% up on budget and costs 1% better than budget.
On the subject of the £2.50 drop off charge, management have again confirmed that when it was introduced the charge was critical for the business. If it were not for the income generated from the £2.50, the likelihood was that the airport would have had to close. Alongside the introduction of the charge internal costs had been cut including people losing their jobs through redundancy.
However, matters had reached the stage earlier this year where a review had been done but it was felt the business was not quite at the stage where it could drop the charge. The Airport had struggled over the last few years and, despite the financial position improving recently it had recently been advised by The Post Office that a critical income stream from them to the Airport may soon be withdrawn
Full details at and click on latest changes
Lottery Scams
The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau has received intelligence regarding new lottery frauds using the 2016 Rio Olympics as a theme.
The scams try to trick people into believing they have won an online lottery prize and a trip to Brazil to watch the Olympics as the recipient’s email address was chosen at random out of a possible ten million potential winners.
In order to collect the winnings the recipient is requested to contact the ‘UK Pay out Officer’ or other unlikely named individuals. They may get more sophisticated over time so be on your guard! 

Dorset’s Clinical Services Review

In our June newsletter we told you about Dorset’s Clinical Services Review, a major exercise that could have implications for the future development of our hospitals due to be launched this autumn. It has just been announced that more preliminary work is needed before the planned public consultation which will now not begin until early 2016.

St Catherine’s Hill

There was a time, not so long ago, when the future of St Catherine’s Hill was as big a hot potato as the new school is today. Thankfully these days a committee of local representatives, including WCRA, quietly work away implementing the management plan.

Recently an inspection of the Hill by CBC, ARC, WCRA and consultant Dick Preston (ex-Forestry Commission) has taken place as a pre-requisite of the next stage of that plan. This will involve some thinning but no clear felling.

The effects of implementing the plan to date are becoming clearer and are regarded as positive – particularly the increase in bird life and the new saplings (including some oak).
The area damaged by the arson is recovering well but there have been further instances of fires being lit (some using wood taken from the scarp edge fencing by the old trig point). A plan to include map references on posts is to be implemented so that a phone call to the emergency services can quote the nearest map reference.

Minutes of the latest management meeting are on the website

Local Events

There’s a lot going on in and around Christchurch from a talk on the Inca city Machu Picchu to an evening with Darren Mullam. Details on
Copyright © 2015 West Christchurch Residents Association, All rights reserved.
Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp